Quick verdict
For ready-to-cut dovetails and strong value, SUIZAN 9.5″ Dozuki Dovetail Saw edges Thomas Flinn 8-inch Dovetail Saw overall; pick Flinn if you’ll sharpen and want walnut feel.
Also check similar comparisons:
- SUIZAN 9.5″ Dozuki Dovetail Saw vs. IRWIN Marples Dovetail Pull Saw
- Thomas Flinn 8-inch Dovetail Saw vs. IRWIN Marples Dovetail Pull Saw
At-a-glance specs
Feature | SUIZAN 9.5″ Dozuki Dovetail Saw | Thomas Flinn 8-inch Dovetail Saw |
|---|---|---|
Blade Length | 9.5 in (240 mm) | 8 in (203 mm) |
TPI/PPI | 17 TPI (1.5 mm pitch) | 20 TPI |
Blade Material | Japanese steel | Carbon steel |
Blade Thickness | 0.012 in (0.3 mm) | 0.022 in (0.56 mm) |
Handle Type and Material | TOUMAKI hand-wrapped handle (material not stated) | Solid walnut handle, brass ferrule; 5 in long, 1-1/4 in diameter |
Tooth Geometry | All-purpose (rip, cross & angle) with METATE teeth and ASARI set | Cross-cut style, minimal set; 0.003 in set per side; teeth resharpenable |
Weight | 0.44 lb (0.2 kg) | ~7 oz (198 g) |
Replaceable or Fixed Blade | Replaceable | Fixed |
Note: We don’t test products ourselves. We review user feedback and/or community discussions to recommend top options with their necessary information. This info can be susceptible to misinterpretation.
Cut Quality & Precision
- SUIZAN 9.5″ Dozuki Dovetail Saw: Thin blade, narrow kerf and 17 TPI give precise, low-tear dovetail cuts.
- Thomas Flinn 8-inch Dovetail Saw: Praised for clean, smooth, precise cuts on small, detailed joinery.
Sharpness & Tuning
- SUIZAN 9.5″ Dozuki Dovetail Saw: Razor-sharp Japanese steel; performs well out of the box on small stock.
- Thomas Flinn 8-inch Dovetail Saw: Often arrives dull; needs sharpening to reach best performance.
Control, Rigidity & Stability
- SUIZAN 9.5″ Dozuki Dovetail Saw: Pull-stroke control with reinforced spine for straighter long cuts and stability.
- Thomas Flinn 8-inch Dovetail Saw: Brass back adds balance; stable, wobble-free feel during use.
Handle & Ergonomics
- SUIZAN 9.5″ Dozuki Dovetail Saw: TOUMAKI wrap can feel cheap or crack; some users modify for comfort.
- Thomas Flinn 8-inch Dovetail Saw: Solid walnut handle and tight fit give steady control, no wobble reported.
Use Case & Limitations
- SUIZAN 9.5″ Dozuki Dovetail Saw: Best for dovetails and fine joinery; not for heavy stock or deep flex cuts.
- Thomas Flinn 8-inch Dovetail Saw: Suited to precise, small-scale joinery; dense hardwoods need a fresh edge.
Scores snapshot
Metric | SUIZAN 9.5″ Dozuki Dovetail Saw | Thomas Flinn 8-inch Dovetail Saw |
|---|---|---|
Blade Length (1–10) | 8 | 5 |
TPI (1–10) | 8 | 2 |
Plate Thickness (1–10) | 4 | 10 |
Tooth Geometry (1–10) | 6 | 10 |
Material (1–10) | 7 | 7 |
Overall Score | 6.6/10 | 6.8/10 |
Who should buy which?
Buy SUIZAN 9.5″ Dozuki Dovetail Saw if you:
- You cut dovetails needing clean, low-tear results.
- You want sharp, controllable pull-stroke performance immediately.
- You prefer replaceable blades and strong price-to-performance.
Buy Thomas Flinn 8-inch Dovetail Saw if you:
- You value smooth, precise cuts after a quick sharpening.
- You want a solid walnut handle with stable balance.
- You will maintain and resharpen a fixed, rigid blade.
Don’t buy either if you:
- You need heavy framing or large timber performance.
- You refuse to sharpen or replace blades when needed.
Final verdict
- SUIZAN 9.5″ Dozuki Dovetail Saw is the better pick for ready-to-cut precision, control and value.
- Both excel at fine joinery; choose Thomas Flinn 8-inch Dovetail Saw if you’ll sharpen and prefer walnut feel and a resharpenable, fixed blade.
The Grain Bros was started to serve woodworkers who can’t find products for their specific use case. We found out that there are not many media outlets extensively covering this topic. That’s why, we are here, to do the research and find the perfect products for your next DIY project. So you don’t have to juggle your tools and laptop at the same time.
If you see any kind of mistake in our content, make sure to reach out to us.
Any images we use in our content can be AI generated, and are for illustration only, in order to make you understand our point better.